Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Card Cheat Caught Using Sandpaper to Mark Cards in Pennsylvania Casino

Marking poker or blackjack cards by scraping them with a tab of sandpaper stuck to the fingertip is about as old as gambling in the Wild West era, but forty-three year-old Sefula Seji of Oak Ridge, New Jersey, must have gone back in time through a time-tunnel and returned to mark cards with sandpaper at the Sands Casino in Bethlehem, PA, that according to gaming authorities who busted him and charged him with 39 counts of cheating at gambling. Seji was jailed in lieu of $75,000 bail, quite a high bail for a non-slot-cheating charge in a casino.

I don't know what the 39 counts are for, unless he was viewed on surveillance tape marking cards during 39 hands of poker or blackjack. The game he allegedly cheated on has not yet been specified.

My take: Well, since table games are new in Pennsylvania, why not introduce them to all the old forms of casino cheating!

Monday, April 11, 2011

Electronic Poker Tables Versus Online Poker Tables--Which Are Safer Against Cheating?

ePoker Table
You all know what online poker tables are, but some of you might not be aware of electronic poker tables or "ePoker" tables that are sprouting up in casinos across the world and in many jurisdictions in the United States that do not allow live poker in casinos.

Basically ePoker is a similation of live poker that is played on an automated poker table with up to 10 players, who each bank the games in turn. Their appearance is very close to live poker tables. The big difference is that there is no need for a dealer, nor do they use cards or chips but rather graphic representations of cards, chips and dealer buttons. You might call it a mix of live poker and online poker, live because you are seeing the faces of the people you play against, and online because you are using buttons instead of actions to play your hands.

So the question arises: What about electonic poker table cheating? Is is more or less prevalent than online poker cheating?

The answer is simple. ePoker cheating is far less prevalent than online poker cheating for one simple reason. Although both forms of poker do not use the human element in the dealing and payoff functions of the game, each player can see the other players, which in itself protects all players from some forms of poker cheating. In online poker you cannot see your opponents using laptops with bot and collusion programs. In ePoker, colluders would have to cheat manually, meaning they would have no computer assistance to help with their calculations. Of course colluders can still collude but their advantage would be less than it is online, therefore you would expect to run into a smaller percentage of cheating players on electronic poker tables because cheats go where there best opportunities lie...online.

My advice: Play electronic poker wherever you can. It is generally the safest form of poker. There is also no card-marking that is seen in live poker games, nor is there any other manipulation of the cards.

Friday, April 08, 2011

Computer-Hacking Online Poker Chip Thief Gets Two Years in Prison!



Source: thisissouthdevon

A gifted computer hacker who stole £7.4million worth of online gambling chips has been jailed for more than two years.

Ashley Mitchell (pictured right), 29, of Little Park Road, Paignton, broke into the system belonging to American gaming giants Zynga Corporation and stole 400 billion chips.

He then set up profiles on the social networking site Facebook and sold some of the chips for a black market value of £53,000.

The court was told Mitchell was a determined offender who researched hacking on the internet in order to cheat the company.

When Zynga installed upgrades to block him he adapted his methods to beat them.

His actions triggered a global hunt by the company for the hacker responsible which ended in Paignton.

The court was told Zynga.com, a web-based company with its headquarters in San Francisco, operates via social networking sites such as Facebook.

Users initially receive 1,000 free chips to play online games such as Mario Brothers, Mafia Wars and poker.

Prosecutor James Taghdissian said in August 2009 the company became aware of some sort of infiltration to its system, which catered for 45 to 50 million poker players.

The company tracked the problem to two employees in San Francisco who were investigated but cleared of doing anything wrong.

It later turned out that Mitchell had used a computer hacking programme available on the internet to assume their identities and used them to credit his own account with chips.

He would then sell the chips to others for profit.

Mr Taghdissian said the company 'narrowed down the hack to the Paignton area'.

Mitchell was tracked down because on one occasion he had used his own Facebook profile to hack into the system.

After a lengthy investigation he was arrested by police in September 2009.

He told police he was responsible for the accessing the system after using the internet search engine Google to learn about hacking.

Mr Taghdissian said Mitchell made a 'determined and repeated effort to attack Zynga's system' in order to obtain chips and sell them for profit to online gamers.

He used some of the money to pay for expensive items such as Rolex watches and to fund a gambling addiction.

He sold around one third of the 400 billion virtual poker chips he stole.

If he had managed to sell them all his total profit would have been about £184,000.

The court was told the difficulty in valuing the chips was because they only existed in the online world.

But if Zynga Corp had sold them legitimately the value would have been $12 million, the equivalent of £7.4million.

The court was told that in 2008 Mitchell defrauded his former employers at Torbay Council of £3,498 after hacking into their system and changing personal details.

He was given a 40-week suspended sentence.

Mitigating, Ben Darby, said the father-of-one deeply regretted bringing shame on his family and had since set up an online gaming business of his own which was successful enough to allow him pay Zynga compensation.

"At the time he was suffering from a gambling addiction," he added.

Judge Philip Wassall told Mitchell that although he targeted a rich multi-national company his actions undermined public confidence in other computer systems run by businesses.

He said: "You used a considerable degree of expertise and persistence through software you purchased to hack into the computer system. The means of gaining access to it shows to me and elaborate and extensive research."

Mitchell, who also asked for 41 related offences to be taken into consideration, was given a two year sentence for the hacking and fraud offences.

He received another 30 weeks for breaching the suspended sentence.

Wednesday, April 06, 2011

What's With This Big Casino Cheating Secret in Saskatchewan?

The other day I reported on the arrests of a casino dealer and six players at the Gold Eagle Casino in North Battleford, Saskatchewan, Canada. According to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority, this insider dealer cheat scam went on for some two years, as long as the investigation. However, neither agency would release details about what the casino-cheat scam was or how it worked. I am assuming it was nothing new, probably a run-of-the-mill-over-pay-the-player blackjack scam, or at best some type of false-shuffle scam (if the casino indeed has a baccarat table).

But why are the authorities so mum on this? The chances of some big sophisticated casino cheating scam happening in this very unimpressive casino are almost nil. I would guess that the reason for this silence is nothing more than the casino's and the Gaming Authority's embarrassment over not having caught on to this scam earlier. Until I hear impressive details, that is what I will continue to think.

In any case, just take a look at this place. It looks like a grind joint!

Monday, April 04, 2011

Dealer and Six Cohorts Busted For Cheating Canadian Casino--Another Inside Casino Cheating Scam!

This time it's the Gold Eagle casino in North Battleford, Saskatchewan, and by looking at the photo of the place, you can see it's a barn at best. Anyhow, seven people are charged with cheating at gambling, although no details of the scam have been released. It appears to be a blackjack scam, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police say the arrests of this "Canadian Seven" is the result of a two year investigation--but don't be fooled by that; how much money could anyone get out of this barn even over a two-year period? We do know, however, the amount cheated out of the casino surpasses $5,000, stated by the felony charges agaisnt the accused. The dealer and his cheating buddies have been banned from all Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority casinos. When I get more on this I will pass it on.

Friday, April 01, 2011

LAND-BASED CASINO-CHEATING LEGALIZED IN LAS VEGAS!!!--FOR TODAY ONLY

In a stunning move today that will have repercussions throughout the casino world, the state legislature of Nevada has passed a bill that will allow all forms of casino cheating in Las Vegas casinos during today only. This means exactly what it sounds like. Beginning 12:00:00 AM today Nevada time, April 1st, up until 11:59:59, all casino cheating moves, no matter how brash, flagrant or stupid, will be lawfully permitted by all casinos in Las Vegas, Nevada. This means you casino cheats, professional and amateurs alike, will have a virtual free-for-all inside Las Vegas's casinos without the worry of getting yourselves busted.

Why is the Nevada State Legislature permitting this casino-cheat free-for-all?

Because it's April FOOLS Day! HA HA!

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

If Online Poker Bots Were Ineffective, Why Would Sites Like Full Tilt and PokerStars Ban Them?

I have long been saying that some poker bots, those that have programmed artificial intelligence that really IS intelligent, do work and statistically prove out to grind money in online poker games. Whether or not the use of bots constitutes cheating at poker online is still open to debate.

Many industry experts say that the vast majority of poker bots are not effective against competent human players. I will not argue that statement either, as the poker bots you can buy online for $129 are only gonna beat weak players. But in no way should you infer that ALL bots are incapable of beating you while you play your honest game. If this were true, online poker sites would not bother hunting down bot players and banning their accounts. Makes sense, doesn't it?

Gaming guru Steve Schwartz has said, "In this day and age, online poker is one of the biggest industries in the world, and when something happens that big, people are always attempting to find ways to cheat. The problem with the poker bots is they still cannot account for human intuition."

Schwartz is right about people always looking for ways to cheat online poker, but he is wrong in making an all-encompassing statement like that about bots. There are highly efficient bots that are not availabe for sale, not on the Internet, not in private circles either. Those using these artificially-intelligent bots do make money playing poker online--consistently.

Brian Jetter, a co-founder of bot-selling company Shanky Technologies, was quoted in the New York Times saying that Full Tilt Poker had banned over 400 of Shaky's customers. Shanky guarantees their poker bots and markets them for a mere $129. Jetter has also stated that most online poker sites don't scrutinize their players as much as PokerStars and Full Tilt, which seemingly contradicts what he says about the effectiveness of Shanky's bots.

My take: Well, I really think Jetter should change the name of his company. I know I would never buy a bot or anything else from a company named Shanky!

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Recognizing the Bullshit Online Poker Cheating Articles Online!

I do consider my website the best source of online poker cheating information online, however, there are other good ones as well...But beware, there are also online poker websites that deal with cheating in a way that is cheating you in itself. In other words, the totality of their online poker cheating information is complete bullshit. To see a good example, read the article below I found on Gaming Today. It is totally full of crap and obviously written for entertainment and promotional value as I cannot find any other reason why it would be written. As you read this article, and others like it on other online poker websites that deal with cheating, you will notice the writer saying things like "I was shown how to do this type of cheating but was assured it would never be done in actual online poker situations," or making general statements about the vast types of cheating in online poker without giving any concrete examples, or saying I know this and that but won't give names.

I, of course, am not saying that cheating in online poker is overstated--anything but (it is indeed RAMPANT). I only want you to recognize the sites that give quality information about online poker cheating as well as those that don't.

Article on Gaming Today:

"A few years ago – I wrote a few columns on the Red Games of Poker (aka cheating). Today it’s time to revisit the subject because of a new system of cheating I have noticed in many of the card rooms. I am not going to name any poker rooms because it can happen in any of them, and I won’t name the historical background of the bad folks or profile any of the red poker players! But look and you will know them by their appearance most of the time. They come in groups of three or four at the table – just look and note the profile!

Get a copy of my new book where I do kick butt and take names! (Of course the whole purpose of this is to get you to buy his book.)

I do think poker is a more honorable game than golf, football, horse racing, baseball, wrestling, tennis, or basketball! Have you seen the recent scandal about an NBA referee betting on games he officiated in? There are also allegations of a betting scandal in tennis that involves players betting on matches they played. Point shaving in basketball was going on half a century ago. Back then it was players shaving points. Now the refs are doing it. It is amazing how long it takes for the true facts to become public knowledge. Back then the bookies would not post the line until 30 minutes before game time in the NBA, and then they would sometimes circle the number – limiting the amount you could bet on that game.

For years I resisted learning about the computer, but now I love all the things you can do with a computer, including playing poker.

But Internet poker can be a very red game! So I do not recommend you play poker on line, except for free games or for very low stakes! Just play for fun. Now if you are playing on line for money pull your chair up close, because I want to whisper to you:

You can be cheated so many ways I cannot count them! I know owners and operators of online sites can do anything to you. I have been in the back office (sure you have) and had the site tell me what they can do. Of course, I was told they would never do it – just a method where they could keep cheating from happening! I know they can give you a royal in hearts, give another player four 9s, and another four 7s – or any poker hands they wish. And if you are lucky enough to win and get ahead, if they wish they can fail to pay you. I remember a site that I requested to send me a check. They sent the check but the bank would not cash it!

I believe owners of online poker sites can and will salt the mine. I will tell you folks that years ago in old west mining camps there was a scam called salting the mine. It went like this.

Crooks would load up several shotguns with gold dust and nuggets, go down into the mine, and shoot the gold into the sides of the mine to give the appearance of a very rich gold mine. They used this trick to help promote stock sales of shares in their mine.

Well, here is what I believe some of the Internet sites do. A new player comes on board with a code number for extra chips. They salt him, and may do so for the first two or three times he sits down to play. Well, that player starts out winning in the salted poker game and thinks, "What a wonderful thing ... I will tell all my friends and they can win a lot of money." And here in Vegas, all the shows are not on the stage. They can show you a white blackbird any time!

There’s more to come about the red games of poker in subsequent issues, but email me at www.oklajohnny@aol. com if you just can’t wait. (I think I can wait.)

OKJ Tip of the Week:

Folks, this old world is a wonderful place and the poker table is one of the nice places to be most of the time! I would rather be at the poker table trusting the players than at a desk or in the office of lawyers, doctors, bankers, car dealers, insurance companies, stock brokers, real estate people, Indian chiefs, politicians or any of the professions.

It is the new West!

Until next time, remember to Stay Lucky!!"

Saturday, March 26, 2011

The Latest: Sebok and More on UltimateBet UB Poker Cheating Scandal!

Source: Poker News

When it comes to developments in the UltimateBet/AP superuser scandal, there are three major instigators: DonkDown Radio, Haley Hintze, and Joe Sebok. Over the past week, the poker world had the opportunity to hear from all three, and each fueled the flames to the UltimateBet scandal. What were the new developments? They involve new cheating allegations, TwoPlusTwo and Twitter drama, and allegations connecting former UltimateBet CEO Greg Pierson to the superuser scandal.

Password Cheating Allegations

On Wed., March 16, 2011, DonkDown Radio revisited the idea, first presented by Travis Makar, that UltimateBet employees had engaged in cheating above and beyond the superuser scandal. DonkDown alleged that employees identified players with high balances on the site, gained access to their accounts by changing their passwords, played under those accounts, and “transferred or dumped the money back to their own account” if they won. On the other hand, if they lost, they hoped the player wouldn’t notice. Furthermore, it was alleged that players were sent a “security e-mail” that claimed “the system automatically changed their password for security reasons.”

DonkDown went on to post an email it had obtained from a player that seemed to corroborate Makar’s allegations that the cheating continued to occur even after the management change (note the date):

From: "UB"
To:
Subject: Your password was reset
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:15:30 -0500

Dear XXXXXX,

As a security measure, your password has been securely and randomly reset by the system. Your temporary password is ********. Please log into your account using this temporary password. We strongly recommend changing your password to a more personalized and easier to remember password as soon as you log in. To modify your password, simply select "Update Profile" from the "My Account" menu and then click on the "Change Password" link. If there is anything else we can help you with, please do not hesitate to contact us via email at security@ub.com. We are always here to assist you.

We look forward to seeing you at the tables again soon!

Sincerely,

The UB Team
security@ub.com

While the above e-mail is not proof by itself, the recipient explained that his attempts to obtain more information from UB have been ignored. DonkDown Radio co-host Todd Witteles elaborated in their forum by providing examples on how a password change could benefit cheaters and pointed out that neither PokerStars or Full Tilt Poker “randomly” force password resets. He went on to say, “I think Travis has to be onto something here, even if his details aren't 100% correct.” One thing is for sure, the emails helped fuel the fire when it came to Makar’s allegations.

Sebok Addresses TwoPlusTwo

Encouraged by his friend Shane Schleger, Joe Sebok started a TwoPlusTwo thread to "address some UB-related comments," among other things.

In the post, Sebok reiterated some facts about the UlitmateBet superuser scandal, which are summarized below:

He admits that the new UB management has made some mistakes, but he does not believe they: “a) actively helped the individuals who cheated to do so or get away with it, b) have doctored hand histories themselves to cover things up, or c) have attempted to hide facts to pay less money out in refunds.”
Both UB and Sebok want any and all information to be released.
UB does not censor, encourage, nor control what Sebok says and does.
Sebok continues to believe that the current ownership is different from the former ownership.
He will attempt to answer reasonable questions on TwoPlusTwo
Indeed, Sebok went on to answer selected questions and tried to establish “some common ground” on some of the UltimateBet facts. The question-and-answer thread, which has been active over the past few days, can be viewed in its entirety on TwoPlusTwo.

Just Conjecturin’, Volume 30

Haley Hintze has been as diligent as anyone in investigating the UltimateBet superuser scandal. In fact, she very well may be the world’s foremost authority on the situation. In her blog, she has posted volumes of information regarding all things UltimateBet in a series known as “Just Conjecturin’.” In her most recent blog, aptly titled, Volume 30: Naming Names — Greg Pierson, Hintze wrote that “Pierson, the President and CEO of ieLogic and Iovation, the company behind the company behind UltimateBet, was another of the likely superusers behind the scandal.”

In that blog, Hintze explained how Pierson’s wife, Janelle Lynn Pierson, became involved in an expensive legal battle after having an affair with one of her high school students. Apparently, the whole debacle put the Pierson's in a tough economic position, which was a possible motivation leading to the cheating scandal’s inception. From there, Hintze laid out Pierson’s position within the company, one that would allow him to develop the “God Mode” program, along with his relationship with Russ Hamilton and Mansour Matloubi, noting, “It was Pierson who had to have held the programming reins, and who reached an agreement with Hamilton and Matloubi [the operational bosses of UltimateBet] to allow the God Mode code to be inserted into the UB client, which in turn allowed the cheating to take place.”

Hintze went on to suggest that perhaps, “Pierson got cold feet about the cheating and decided to cover his own tracks while leaving other cheating accounts in place that could be easily tied to others, as in those pointing to Hamilton.” Hintze’s argument, which is simply summarized here, is backed up with plenty of facts and circumstantial evidence that lends credence to her hypothesis.

For more on the subject, check out Hintze's entire blog.

No doubt the new allegations will inspire new information and responses concerning the UltimateBet superuser scandal, in which case, PokerNews will be here to keep you abreast of the latest developments.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Cheating Casinos Back in the Day...What Would it Have Been Like?

Las Vegas in 1931
Did you ever dream you could step into a time tunnel and step out way back when and apply what you know now about making money to back then? I am not talking about betting on a historical or sporting event for which you know the outcome even though it has not yet taken place. I am talking about applying a specific skill that you have today to a task in the past. One analogy would be to have twenty-first century equipment or weaponry to be used in construction or deconstruction (war).

Well, I have had this dream (although in a fully conscious state, so it's more a thought than a dream) of applying my casino cheating ability to casinos way back when. Let's say I stepped out of a time machine into Las Vegas, Nevada in 1931, the year that casino gambling was legalized in the Silver State. What casino moves would I do in 1930s Vegas casinos?

First, let's take a look at what casino surveillance was like back then. There were no cameras. There weren't even catwalks (narrow corridors above the casino tables whose floors has one-way mirror patterns so that the action could be observed from above). At the time, the only surveillance was slick ex-cheats and cons walking around the casino looking for suspicious activity that could be cheating.

So, would I run up to a roulette table and do a third-section pastpost?

Absolutely not! That's because the casino wiseguys lurking around the tables knew how easy and popular it was to pastpost roulette tables. And...they would have a great chance of seeing the pastposter's hands out on the layout when they weren't supposed to be there.

How 'bout my famed Savannah roulette pinch move?

Well, she would have worked but there would have been the chance that one of the sharpies could see the high denomination check hidden from the dealer from a position behind the bet. That big-value chip would have been sticking out in the rear. The Savannah move was really primed for beating the surveillance cameras.

What about the bread-and-butter blackjack ten-oh-five?

You hit the nail on the head! This move would have been the best because it is done when the blackjack player's hands are supposed to be on the layout, mainly when picking up the winning chips the dealer just paid him.

Okay, I know this posting is just mental masturbation--but OH how I would love to go back in time for just one day and go to work on Vegas's old-time casinos!

PS: Now that I think of it, I could have made a fortune by simply collecting the gold coins and silver dollars used in those casinos and bringing them back to today! I wouldn't have had to cheat!