 |
| They See it all, right? WRONG! |
We have all seen countless TV programs depicting just how impossible it
is to cheat in modern gambling casinos
in Las Vegas and across the world. Surveillance and security gurus like the
Atrium's Ted Whiting give us demonstrations how they use this ultra-high-tech
equipment to monitor their casino floors and then film and nab the casino
cheats after gathering all that video evidence. Then, of course, come the
big-bad agents swarming to the tables to bust the cheats.
Slam-dunk, right?
Not really.
All those surveillance-camera video sequences you see on TV that lead to
putting cheats in jail and saving the casino millions of dollars are certainly
true when they happen.
And that is the key: WHEN they happen. The reality is that when
you take into account the tremendous volume of cheating that goes down in
casinos, all that high-tech video surveillance rarely comes into play--in fact,
surveillance itself rarely comes into play.
What am I talking about?
I'm talking about the problem. Which is that what Ted Whiting and the
other TV casino-surveillance stars fail to mention on the broadcasts.
It is simply this: the more sophisticated that surveillance systems
become, the less capable casino floor personnel become. And this is not
difficult to understand. Casino floorpeople and pit bosses lose their
motivation to learn and understand casino-cheating because they know that the
casino's video cameras will record everything, and all they have to do is wait
for the surveillance department to call them and report that they have picked
up on a casino cheat and now they, the floorpeople, can go and catch him.
But what they don't know, or at least not take into account, is that the
cameras cannot initiate anything themselves. They cannot tell the casino employees
on the floor that they have just recorded a cheating incident and that someone
should call them, the cameras, for details. Video cameras cannot tap a
floorperson on the shoulder and say, "Hey, Mac, a guy on blackjack table
#4 just capped his bet after getting blackjack," or, "that girl with
the blond wig just pastposted a bet on roulette table #2."
It has to work in reverse. The employee on the floor has to see...or at
least suspect...a cheat-move going down, and then he has to call the
surveillance operators and report his findings so that they can go review the
video evidence.
This is how it should work--but it rarely does. In fact, during
my twenty-five-year cheating-career, never...and I mean NEVER...did a
surveillance operator upstairs catch on to one of my cheating moves.
And what
compounded the problem for the casinos is that their employees on the floor
rarely got suspicious of anything I ever did at the tables. And that's because
they simply didn't know what to look for because they figured the cameras would
do the looking for them.
And imagine how much worse this problem is now. I've been retired from
active casino-cheating for 16 years, and surveillance equipment has only
improved exponentially. Which of course means that the capacity of casino
floorpeople to recognize scams on their own feet has declined, maybe not as
exponentially, but certainly significantly.
So what I suggest to Ted Whiting and any other directors of casino
surveillance is to get some good training programs into action to teach their
casino floor employees a thing or two about spotting a cheat on their own and
protecting their gaming tables.