Friday, March 11, 2011

Sebok Gives His Version of Latest UB.com Online Poker Cheating Scandal

Source: Poker News

This week, Joe Sebok gave two interviews to address the recent announcements regarding the UltimateBet superuser scandal. If you recall, over the past few weeks, Travis Makar released two e-mails, one that contained a “God Mode” attachment and one that centered on a blackmail situation between UB COO Paul Leggett and Zoltan “Brainwashdodo” Rozsa.

On Wednesday, March 2, 2011, Sebok sat down with Mark Gahagan and Matt Kaufman of CardRunners for an interview regarding Makar, the missing UB histories, and to present some answers from Leggett on previously posed questions. To kick things off, Sebok claimed that UB attempted to reach out to Makar but had difficulties connecting. When asked whether Makar had reciprocated their attempts to communicate, Sebok was unsure but emphasized he wanted any and all information to be released if at all possible.

The hosts went on to ask whether UB would be prepared to offer refunds if missing hand histories -- which are 10 percent of the hands associated with the superuser accounts -- were revealed and showed that additional accounts had been cheated. Sebok responded that he believed so but that many critics would never be satisfied no matter what the new UB does to rectify the situation, and that at some point you have to say “enough is enough” in regards to the refunds.

The interview proceeded to turn its attention to the extortion e-mail between Rozsa and Leggett. Sebok claimed to have talked to Leggett, who admitted writing the e-mail, and believed the correspondence didn’t prove anything except that Leggett considered paying the money, an act Sebok found to be natural and nonsuspicious.*

*The act of considering to pay, not actually paying, which Sebok agreed would be wrong.

Late in the interview, the host revealed that they had given Sebok questions to pose directly to Leggett. Sebok had done just that and brought back answers discussing a number of issues. First, Leggett wanted to clarify a previous statement that he had never met nor spoken with Russ Hamilton. Leggett’s response confirmed that he had never met Hamilton, but that he did in fact speak with him once during the early stages of the superuser investigation. Second, the rumor that Leggett sent armed thugs to Rozsa’s house to intimidate him was not in context. Instead, it was simply a company guard sent to verify Rozsa’s home address. Finally, Leggett confirmed that no one working for or involved with the current UB company was associated with the cheating scandal.

A few days later, on Sunday, March 6, 2011, Sebok sat down for another interview with Poker Static Hot Seat hosts Bret Oliverio and Eric Bickel. There he reiterated what he said in the CardRunners interview but in a manner that seemed a bit more composed and scripted. It was there that Sebok admitted:

“We have to be able to say, ‘Hey, we screwed up.’ And probably this e-mail communication is one of those things, ‘Hey, we screwed up. We probably shouldn’t have dealt with this guy but we did. It doesn’t make us Russ Hamiltons ... it doesn’t mean we cheated with him, but let’s own up to it and say hey we did this thing ... It’s a far cry from the actual, did they help these guys cheat ... That has always been my stance, if I ever find any information that says these guys did this, or Paul is lying to me, or anything like that, then I’ll leave. I’ve said that for a long, long time.”

Sebok went on to urge anyone with information -- whether it be Makar, poker media outlets, or even Haley Hintze -- to make it available to everyone. Hintze, of course is the woman who has taken it upon herself to conduct an in-depth investigation into the superuser scandal, often revealing her findings in her blog. Speaking of Hintze, in her latest post, dated February 28, 2011, she examined the aforementioned e-mail in detail and previewed the focus of her upcoming post.

“I have very strong reasons to believe that ‘superuser1’ will turn out to be company founder Greg Pierson, and I will devote a very lengthy Volume 30 of this series to laying out the extensive circumstantial case that points to Pierson. It's a post I've delayed writing for quite some time, partly in hopes that a true smoking gun would emerge to buttress the many puzzle pieces I've already obtained. It's also a distasteful post, as it goes into motive for the entire UB cheating scandal getting started, something no outside investigator has yet adequately explained.”

Given that Hintze’s aforementioned blog had not been released at the time of the interviews, the topic was obviously not addressed. However, it does suggest that this story will become more complicated in the near future. To summarize what Sebok said in the two interviews:

He wants the information to come out and urges Makar, and anyone else with pertinent information, to come forward.
He urged Leggett to be forward and honest about his email correspondence with “Brainwashdodo.”
Just because a company doesn’t want information to come out does not necessarily mean it is “cheating” related.
If he finds out Leggett has been lying and the new UB played a role in the cheating scandal, then he will leave the company.
While Sebok did not necessarily present new information, the interviews drew a lot of attention from the poker community. Some were reassured by Sebok, while others were not convinced; for example, Todd Witteles, one of Sebok’s biggest and most outspoken critics took to the DonkDown forums and offered his opinion on the latter interview.

“I actually hated this interview a lot more than the Cardrunners one. At least the Cardrunners one featured some brutal honesty on Joe's part -- that he didn't feel people deserved to be paid back if they persisted with their ‘hating’ on him and UB. This [Poker Static] interview featured Joe staying calm and repeating that he'll resign if any proof comes to light that UB's crooked, but that he has faith in Paul Leggett/UB. He basically answered nothing. This interview also focused more on Joe himself and less about UB. Nobody cares that much about Joe's own plight. I want to see reps like Joe squirm when they are asked the tough UB-related questions.”

Given the fact that Hintze is preparing to release more information, and that Makar continues to withhold his evidence, it is clear the UltimateBet superuser scandal drama is far from over. As always, PokerNews will be here to bring you any and all developments as they happen.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

New WSOP Media Rules to Combat Blogger/Reporter Tournament Cheating...Are They Fair---or Ridiculous?

I have been blogging about the recent poker tournament cheating scams where players are using reporters and bloggers who sit and hang around the tables ostensibly looking to interview players and report on the action but who are really looking at the players' hole cards and signalling those values to players they are in cohoots with. The biggest reporter/blogger poker tournament cheat scam so far involved Ali Tekintamgac on the Partouche Poker Tour; he won the WPT event in Barcelona but was accused of using fake bloggers to spy his opponents' hole cards.

So now the WSOP rules committee has decided to implement two new rules to combat this type of collusion cheating, which is indeed serious and has that very type of repercussion on the outcome of final tables and near final tables during a poker tournament.

The first new rule that is to protect the integrity of the tournament and the security of the players and staff, according to a WSOP spokesman, is that no members of the media will be permitted at any single table for more than 5 minutes during each half hour. Well, this is a bit hard to digest, especially when reporters and bloggers are looking for big names involved in big pots. It often takes more than five minutes for a big pot to develop and play out, therefore reporters and bloggers would not be able to stay and cover that type of action, which is highly coveted by poker fans in front of TV and computer screens.

The second new anti-media-cheat poker rule is that members of the media will not be permitted to talk to players while cards are on the table. This will have the same type of negative effect as the first new rule and will also force bloggers and reporters to reduce the details on hands and strategies recounted by players involved as well as the general poker talk and entertaining stories related to the play of tournaments.

My take: I think these new anti-poker-tournament cheat rules are exaggerated. In fact, better than to iniciate this would be to increase the scrutiny on who the reporters and bloggers around the tables actually are. Since Ali Tekintamgac was accused of using FAKE bloggers with no legitimate accreditation and that the vast majority of these reporter/blogger poker cheats have no real affiliation to any accredited blog or media source, we in the poker world would all be better served by a format that really checks out all reporters and bloggers attending major poker tournaments.

Wednesday, March 09, 2011

Foxwoods, Casino Cheating Capital of the World, Strikes Again!

Like I have always said, this giant casino in Connecticut called Foxwoods, has always been, and will always be, the casino cheating capital of the world--for both inside and outside casino scams. The latest is another huge dealer generated cheating scam on Foxwoods' pai gow tables.


A Foxwoods dealer from Norwich and two alleged accomplices were arrested Tuesday on charges they worked together to cheat while playing pai gow at the casino.

Pai gow dealer Chen Xiuhie, 29, of 158 Summit St. in Norwich, was arrested with casino patrons Guang S. Li, 37, of Braintree, Mass., and Norman Chun Tung Wong, 38, of San Francisco.

All three were charged with two counts each of third-degree larceny, conspiracy to commit third-degree larceny, cheating and conspiracy to commit cheating.

Chen was released on a $5,000 cash bond and is due to appear March 22 in New London Superior Court. Wong and Li were held on $50,000 bond and were expected for arraignment Tuesday in New London.

Police said they anticipate future arrests.

Tuesday, March 08, 2011

Singapore Casino Cheat Working With Dealer on Inside Scam Gets Four and a Half Years in Prison

Thirty-two-year-old Tan Tiong Loon has just become the the first person in Singapore's young history of legal casino to gambling to be found guilty of cheating a casino in a partnership with a casino dealer. The already charged car-thief was out on bail for boosting cars when he committed the casino cheating offense last October 7th. Loon convinced 24-year-old dealer Keith Yong Kee-Hwei to cheat his big money wheel game for fifty percent of their ill-gotten winnings. Yong Kee-Hwei was able to manipulate the spin of the wheel with his hand on two different spins to get the big winners that totalled $31,500. Supposedly a Chinese gambler not involved in the scam caught on and ratted the pair out (tough break). The dealer has also been charged in the casino cheating scam but his case has not yet gone to court. I guess he will probably take a plea.

My take: Well, I always say: better to cheat casinos without the dealer-help. Problem is, hardly anyone is capable of doing that effectively.

Thursday, March 03, 2011

Three-Card Poker Cheat Busted Switching Cards at Pennsylvania Casino!

The rinky-dink casino cheat scams continue in Pennsylvania's new table-games casinos. The latest is a card-switching cheat expedition carried out by thirty-eight year-old Kip Patton Sr of Philadelphia at the Parx Casino in Bensalem. Patton was at the table playing two separate hands of three-card poker, and he decided to improve his odds of winning by switching cards between the two hands to improve one or both of his hands.

Card-Switching can be a very effective method for cheating at poker and casinos--WHEN done by professionals. No doubt Patton is a rank amateur. If he were more professional, I doubt the novice surveillance staff would have caught him.

Read more about first-rate card-switching cheating scams here.

Wednesday, March 02, 2011

What Really Happened to Casino and Poker Cheats in the Old "Mob Experience" Days?

Have you heard about the new "Mob Experience" tourist attraction at the Tropican Casino-Hotel in Las Vegas that's slated to open March 29th? If not, it's simply a Mafia gig where you pay $40 and walk through a door into the history of the Mafia and various mobsters who thrived in Las Vegas since gambling became legal there in 1931. You are accompanied by the voice of the celebrity actor you choose upon entry (James Caan, Tony Sirico and others who have portrayed gangsters in movies and TV) who guides you through the tour. You visit Mafia hangouts, sit-downs, Prohibition-era saloons, police stations and, of course, casinos, meeting infamous mobsters like Bugsy Siegel and Meyer Lansky. Along the way you stumble onto a casino catwalk (the old-days' pre-video-camera surveillance system where ex-cheats hired by casinos peer through one-way mirrors at cheats in action on the tables) and witness a cheat getting caught switching cards on a blackjack table, who is then dragged away by a bunch of big goons carrying Louisville Slugger baseball bats and beaten up behind a door behind a silhouette image.

So, what really happened to those unlucky casino and poker cheats caught cheating in these old Vegas mobster days? Were they really beaten and sometimes taken out to the desert and "hit" (killed)? You bet, although the beatings were far more frequent than actual killings over cheating incidents. The mobsters running the casinos back then were more interested in teaching would-be cheats a lesson in deterrence by having them see the faces of their peers bandaged up and their legs broken.

All this rough stuff against cheats ended in the late '70s, luckily for me about the time I got started in the casino-cheating business. Although in the beginning of my casino-cheat career I was threatened with physical harm in casino backrooms (one security guy at the old Desert Inn telling me he was going to take me up to the roof and push me out onto the Strip), no one ever actually laid a glove on me.

Tuesday, March 01, 2011

Dealer in Singapore's Resorts World Casino Cheats it Out of More Than $100 K!

cheating hottie!
Another story of how oceans of casino cheats are preying upon Singapore's two casinos--from the inside, outside...and just about everywhere. How inept can Singapore's casino surveillance departments be?

Source: onlinepoker.net

The daughter of a famous actor has been sentenced to twenty one months in jail after stealing $110,400 worth of chips while working as a croupier at a casino.

Chiu Yee-Fong, 30, daughter of famous Taiwanese actor Chiu Yong Qin, (pictured right), was working as a croupier at Singapore’s Resorts World Sentosa Casino, where she squirreled away the vast amount of $100 to $1,000 chips between 28th September to 7th November, 2010.

Over a month period, Chiu Yee-Fong would take chips from her float and later discreetly hand them over to her boyfriend to cash, telling him they were her tips from customers. Most of the money she then deposited in her DBS savings account, although $11,100 in chips were also discovered at her dormitory in Toa Payoh.

Chiu Yee-Fon managed to get away with the continual theft until one day a fellow croupier noticed a chip on her chair during one of her breaks, and a later examination of CCTV footage then showed she had placed chips into her blouse on no less than 144 occasions.

Following the revelation of his daughter’s casino theft, Mr Chiu, also an actor, said that over the past few months she was having problems adapting to life in Singapore and that restitution would be made to the casino. Commenting on the matter, Mr Chiu said:

“Now that it has happened, we must face the facts and take responsibility for it. We will return the money that was stolen, it doesn’t belong to us after all…Normally, the time I spend with her is quite little. Here I am probably to blame,”

Subsequently, police were able to recover $96,157 from her with her parents paying back the outstanding $14,243 to the Resorts World Sentosa Casino.

After she received the 21 month sentence in court on Tuesday, Chiu Yee-Fong was reduced to tears and wept to her parents that she wanted to go home.

Despite her sentence, things could certainly have been worse for the famous actor’s daughter, as she could have received up to 15 years in jail and/or fined up to $150,000 for criminal breach of trust.

My take: Man, if HER looks could kill! This really goes to show how weak surveillance departments are in Singapore. I also get the feeling that this little Asian hottie was in it just for the thrills! Now she'll have to chill out awhile.

Any Truth to Online Blackjack Cheating Claims?

If you surf blackjack cheating online, you will come across various sites claiming various methods for cheating online blackjack games. Are any of these claims true?

Let's examine the two online blackjack cheating methods I have come across the most. The first is the use of blackjack cheating bots. What is a blackjack bot? It is exactly the same thing as a poker bot. It keeps track of the cards played and allows the user to make decisions on betting strategies and hand-play based on the cards already played. Sounds good but the only problem is that at best these blackjack bots might help you count the cards, but unfortunately that means nothing as the cards are shuffled randomly via random number generators after every hand. In short, you can toss your blackjack bots.

The second blackjack online cheating claim is that you can use online blackjack cheat software to bypass the effectiveness of the random number generator, which shuffles the cards at a supposed total randomness. Although it is true that no machine can generate total randomness in card shuffling, the algorithm of shuffles is not predictable no matter what kind of software you are using in that aim. Sites selling random-number- generator cracking equipment claim that programs can find patterns in cards already dealt which allows it to predict the next cards that will be dealt and give an advantage to the user. They say that this is possible through flaws in random number generators. Only problem: the flaws, although there, are never nearly big enough to allow the online blackjack game to be beat via that type of cheating method.

My take: Forget about online blackjack cheating and stick to online poker cheating!

Monday, February 28, 2011

UB.com COO Leggett Responds to Travis Makar's Online Poker Cheat Claims...Calls Them Extortion!

Source: Poker News Daily

The poker world was stunned last week when Travis Makar, one of the people allegedly involved in the Ultimate Bet super user scandal, called into the DonkDown Radio show and revealed that he had a large number of documents regarding the site’s involvement in the scandal from years ago. Makar stated that he never worked for Ultimate Bet, but he obtained the documents through years of working on the computers of major players involved in the scam.

On Tuesday, Makar met with DonkDown Radio’s Bryan Micon to show him some of the documents he claimed to have at his home. One piece of evidence supposedly revealed an e-mail sent by current UB.com COO Paul Leggett to Zoltan “Brainwashdodo” Rozsa, who was allegedly trying to extort Leggett for information he had about the cheating incidents. Micon verified that the e-mail was dated June 30, 2008 and posted it on the DonkDown forum later that day:

“Hi Zoltan,

If you are saying that you are giving up on the extortion and confirming that you will not disclose the information you took from us… I am very happy to hear this. I realize that you do not trust me, and obviously it is impossible for me to trust you. Before you decide to disclose any information, I would just like to reaffirm that if you do release confidential company information, I will be forced to involve the police in this situation.

However, I would prefer to exhaust all avenues of negotiation prior to doing this. I realize that money is important to you and the confidentiality of our information is important to us. If you want to meet, I would be willing to give you a reasonable amount of money (much smaller than the amount you requested), but I need you convince me that day that you will bring all of the important information and you will stop with the threats and illegal activities against our company.

Regards, Paul”

Leggett addressed the e-mail and other topics in his blog at UB.com on Wednesday:

“Firstly, I want to make sure everyone knows that I never made an offer to pay off Brainwashdodo and I never did pay or instruct any payment to be made to Brainwashdodo. It is true that he tried to blackmail our company by threatening to release a bunch of confidential company information including financial records and player data. However, after unsuccessfully trying to pursue him with the help of local law enforcement, I simply told him that I was unwilling to pay anything to him.”

“There is no doubt that Brainwashdodo did try to extort me,” Leggett continued. “I did arrange to meet him because I did not want him to post our company’s data and I wanted him arrested for trying to blackmail the company. I do remember considering paying him to not release a bunch of information, but after a great deal of thought, I decided it was best not to take part in the extortion and we never paid him a dime.”

Leggett’s blog was posted during the airing of Wednesday’s DonkDown Radio show, which featured guests Makar, blogger Haley Hintze, and poker player Brad Booth, who said he lost around $1.5 million during the superuser scandal. Booth had his life turned upside down during that period and shared his side of the story with the hosts, including an occurrence in which Russ Hamilton called him immediately after Booth had a losing session on Ultimate Bet to offer him money to continue playing. Booth accepted and said he lost the money within 10 minutes.

Makar then joined the show and confirmed that Booth had been cheated after he named off accounts that he had lost money to during the scandal. Makar was amazed that he had never met Booth before, but the two discussed their relationship with Hamilton and shared a similar bond after they each lost nearly everything following the scandal.

Two Roulette Computer Sellers Are Cheats and Frauds

Here is an email that I received from Mark Anthony Howe, who hawks roulette computers online that will not make you any money.

"Take a look at http://stevenhoumouzis.com

Look at the video on the home page that you come too.

Then watch the video, note the number under the 8 oclock postion when Hourmouzis releases the ball, he is simply placing where he wants the ball to go!

This is common dealer signature, but he does not reveal this, but instead pretends he has a special magic pattern system or that his roulette computers are effective, thought you might like to see how dealers with just 30 minutes training can also do this little trick! I was the only one to spot this fraudster!"

I tried to look at the video but the link Howe sent me was broken. In any event, what he says, whether it be true or not, doesn't really matter because not only is Hourmouzis a fraud--Howe is a BIGGER fraud. Avoid both these guys and their roulette computers like the plague!