Friday, October 17, 2014
The key word is "alter," which Ivy did by having dealers deal the baccarat games in a matter that was not correlating to official casino dealing and game-protection procedure.
Now an English high court agrees. Crockford´s casino in London, who refused to grant Ivy his $12 million in winnings, now does not have to legally do so, as the judge ruled that edge-sorting is cheating. Ivy, who victimized the Borgata casino in Atlantic City with the same scam is now being sued by that casino in an attempt to recover millions of dollars that had been paid to Ivy upon his cheating at their baccarat tables.
So Ivy, who lost his suit as the plaintiff against Crockfords, may now soon lose his next lawauit against the Borgata as the defendant.
My take: I think the Borgata may not have the same success legally in the US as Crockfords had in the UK, but I still think they are entitled to win the case as I consider Phil Ivey a casino cheat.